News, Top Story

Chastanet Delivers ‘Cynical Jabs’ at Government Representatives

PM Pierre Asserts: We Will Not Be Swayed by ‘Political Diatribe’

By VOICE Reporter
Opposition Leader Allen Chastanet (Photo credit: United Workers Party)
Opposition Leader Allen Chastanet (Photo credit: United Workers Party)

As Saint Lucia approaches its next general election constitutionally due within a year, the island’s major political parties are engaged in intense public debates and confrontations.

The criticisms exchanged have been far from complimentary, signaling a looming clash as the public and various groups closely monitor the unfolding situation.

Veering away from typical ‘Town Hall Meetings,’ the political landscape has grown more contentious, with sharp jabs aimed squarely at political opponents.

At the forefront, the main opposition party, the United Workers Party (UWP), has shown no hesitation in its relentless criticisms of the government’s management of state affairs.

This week, Opposition Leader Allen Chastanet launched pointed and personal attacks against prominent government figures and other individuals affiliated with state-related departments. Cabinet ministers Richard Frederick, Stephenson King, and Thaddeus Antoine, Chairman of the Saint Lucia Tourism Authority (SLTA), are among those facing the UWP’s harsh scrutiny.

Using a public platform to deliver his critiques, Chastanet accused Frederick of questionable parliamentary representation for Central Castries, insinuating involvement in dubious activities. He further denigrated the MP for Castries North Stephenson King, labelling him “Stephenson Queen.”

“I’ve heard stories about Castries South – (he’s a ‘Bolom’) – and he has a friend, the lawyer Thaddeus Antoine,” Chastanet stated, refraining from delving into more specifics.

In local parlance, the term “Bolom” implies a ‘sinister being’ aligned with negative elements.

Prime Minister Philip J Pierre (File photo)
Prime Minister Philip J Pierre (File photo)

In response, Prime Minister Phillip J. Pierre categorically dismissed these criticisms as baseless public venting. He emphasised the necessity to concentrate on national development and elevating public discourse.

Taking a firm stance against what he deemed as ‘political diatribe,’ PM Pierre stated, “I don’t engage in that. When you open these ‘Pandora boxes,’ they stay open. But as Prime Minister, I cannot lead this country into debates about ‘La Jablesse,’ ‘Bolom,’ or people’s sexual preferences. I refuse to go there.”

The Prime Minister further asserted, “There are critical issues at hand; too many real challenges that we must confront as a nation. We need to focus on sustaining the small gains we’ve made.”

PM Pierre stressed the importance of distinguishing between ‘political mudslinging’ and vital state matters that require attention.

He urged young people to shift their focus away from political slander and engage with more positive initiatives, insisting, “I want my country to develop. These arguments are disheartening, and I won’t allow myself to be dragged into them because I have a country to run.”

Moreover, PM Pierre declared, “As Prime Minister, my responsibility is to safeguard the welfare of the people.”

With the momentum building toward another electoral challenge, the political rivalry intensifies as opposing parties seek to establish their distinct terms of engagement.

Only time will tell whose conflicting views will resonate with the voting public.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Send this to a friend