Letters & Opinion

Why We Can’t Wait

Image of John Peters
By John Peters

MARTIN Luther King wrote a very compelling book entitled “Why We Can’t Wait”. He declared that it was now or never for this atrocity of segregation to end and was willing to die for the cause. One of his famous quotes is: “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent on the things that matter.”

I was enamoured with the language used by King in that period. As a young ten-year-old, I was able to recite long sections of his great speeches. I also cannot remain silent on the things that matter to me. I was quite surprised at the announcement that the Budget for this year would be almost the same figure as last year. I was hoping that the hard, difficult and politically unrewarding steps to reduce our debt would have started this year.

I want to make the case for why we can’t wait on debt reduction. I want to start with the Capital Expenditure of Fiscal Year 2016-2017 as the base year. The Approved Estimates contained a sum of $325,976,700 as the Capital Expenditure. The total was comprised the following:
• CIP Revenue — $ 24,000,000
• Sale of Assets — $ 33,873,477
• Capital Project Grants — $ 97,248,170
• Bonds — $ 96,652,641
• Capital Project Loans ( Funding Agencies ) — $ 74,202,592

It is of equal importance to look at how these funds were allocated with specific reference to the short-term, high interest rate bonds. We are placing bonds at up to 7% interest. The last general elections were to be funded from Government Bonds to the sum of $2.5 million. Certainly we have expensive elections. NICE was to be funded by Bonds to the sum of $18.6 million. Desilting rivers and drains funded by bonds to the sum of $1.5 million. There was even a sum of $421,500 from bonds to be allocated to support the Constituency Development Programme. The SMILE project was funded by bonds. Tourism Market Programme of $16.5 Million was to be funded by bonds. Our CDB contributions were to be funded by bonds.

No country can survive with a policy of borrowing money at high interest rates and use it to clean drains, run general elections and engage in social programmes. Our economy has grown at an average of 1.55% over the last 20 years, 0.94% over the last 10 years and 0.4 % over the last 5 years. The Ministers for Finance, in my view, for the last 20 years have failed the people of Saint Lucia.

Political expediency and political survival were the dominant thought processes that dictated fiscal policy. The Eastern Caribbean Central Bank also has to take some blame. In November 2002, the eight ECCB member countries established a regional market for Government Securities with the assistance of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank. The intent was to create a regional market which would allow all member governments to issue their securities throughout the member countries and beyond. This approach would allow residents and non-residents to buy and sell the securities of their choice. The initiative was hoped to enhance the investment options available to investors by enabling investment opportunities beyond the domestic/home market, incorporating the regional market as well.

However, it became a pot of honey for governments. Treasury bills/notes and bonds can be easily obtained and the funds used without any restrictions which normally will accompany a loan from a funding agency. So a Minister for Finance can buy a plane if he so wishes with the bonds. Unfettered, it became a feeding frenzy. Between the period 2001-2015, St. Lucia borrowed $ 2.0 billion. We now have over $800 million in treasury bills/notes and bonds.

Dr. Salim Furth, an economist, wrote an article entitled “High Debt is a Real Drag”. In the article, he states that three independent teams of economists have separately shown that high government debt has a negative effect on long-term economic growth. Furth stated that when government debt grows, private investment shrinks, lowering future growth and future wages.

The studies showed two significant factors of high debt: debt drag and debt overhang. One study done by Reinhart, Reinhart and Rogoff found that government debt overhang tends to last a long time, sometimes over a decade, and many debt overhang episodes featured slow growth. Another interesting comment was that when savings are invested in government bonds, they cannot also be invested in productive capital. Thus when government borrowing crowds out private investment, the economy invests in less capital per worker, causing workers to be less productive and earn lower wages.

The Government of St. Lucia cannot continue borrowing using these short-term instruments of treasury bills/notes and bonds at high interest rates. We have to begin to focus on reducing our debt as has happened in Grenada and St. Kitts. We have to direct any surplus/windfall into reducing debt, and thus every cent from the CIP should go to debt reduction. We have to move to fiscal responsibility legislation and both the opposition and government need to arise to a mature discussion on the economy instead of this debate on ‘irrelevant details’ that has characterized our political discourse.

“St. Jude – We like it so? – Part 3” has to wait until next week. However, St. Lucia cannot wait for this fiscal policy transformation!!

1 Comment

  1. How do we change the blue print to fiscal responsibility, when the characteristics of doing business in Saint Lucia is governed by any one, two , three or all of these vices at any one time: nepotism, greed, corruption, malfeasance and fraud. That concept starts at elementary school level, but here’s the kicker. Government assistance to schools: Teachers salaries are paid by the government and government assistance to the schools amounts to: $100 dollars per student, per school term, now how are we supposed to develope a mentally and healthy society trained to be fiscally responsible, if the government does not provide stronger funding to these learning instituions. Funding for our educationally system is woefully inadequate so if these politicians can not understand that simple concept. How are we going to change the blue print??. Keep giving ’em hell, Eng. Peters.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *