TENSIONS are rising between residents of Mon Repos and Patience and the Ministry of Education over the proposed merger of Mon Repos Combined Primary School and Patience Combined Primary School.
The Deputy Permanent Secretary (DPS) in the Ministry of Education, Innovation, Gender Relations and Sustainable Development, Michelle Charles said the merger is just a proposal.
However, that view is not one shared by the respective residents of Mon Repos and Patience, who in general think that a decision has already been made to merge the schools, despite the two consultative meetings which have taken place over the past two weeks.
Over the last two weeks there have been two meetings held in the communities of Mon Repos and Patience by technocrats from the Ministry of Education, to discuss with local stakeholders, the possibility of a merger of the two schools.
Neither of the meetings was widely known by the public at large, as The VOICE only found out about them after being tipped off by one of the parents of the Mon Repos Combined School, who had attended and who wanted to express his dissatisfaction with the potential closure of the school.
“The meeting was held at the Mon Repos School…at 4:30p.m. on the 13th of February, 2018” said a parent, who wished to retain his anonymity. “The meeting was held with the parents of the student body and Ministry Officials, including the DPS who is Mrs. Charles; (as well as) Dr. Louis and Mr. Khodra” he said in an interview with The VOICE.
Describing what he called the consensus disagreement with the proposed merger, he stated that “the parents totally disagreed with the idea and they said that the consultation…with them…was happening very late” despite the fact that “they believed that they were probably the primary stakeholders in the school;” since “they’re the parents of the students.” This sentiment was also repeated by parents in Patience.
The Mon Repos Combined School parent also described the general attitude of the parents at the meeting as one of “dissatisfaction” and “disrespect”, stating: “you had to have some footage of the way the meeting went to show the dissatisfaction, the disrespect that the parents pronounced in the meeting, how they felt and how the matter was being dealt with.”
The occurrence of the meeting in Mon Repos was confirmed by the DPS Michelle Charles. She also confirmed that the meeting in Mon Repos Combined was a bit tumultuous.
“Yes the meetings were two very different meetings, the reception was really different. In Mon Repos, the parents were a bit more vocal and they raised a number of concerns,” she said.
Describing the parents who attended the meeting at Patience Combined as “a bit more receptive” to the proposal, DPS Charles stated that “one of the key concerns…was that…they would really want to ensure that if we are going to take the time and bring in all students inside of here that we are able to make the Patience School, a state-of-the-art, a model school, a smart school, a smart primary school, one of the best on the island.”
“When we did our initial estimate from the Ministry of Education’s perspective–some persons may have different opinions–we realised that, or we suggested that the Patience Combined School can accommodate all students (of the Mon Repos Combined School) with minimal adjustment. There will be some adjustments but they will be minimal adjustments,” said Deputy Chief Education Office (planning) Kendal Khodra.
This viewpoint was re-emphasized by Charles in a post meeting interview at Patience Combined when she stated that “There were a number of factors that led us to leaning towards the Patience School, but I think…one of the major points for Patience was the quality of infrastructure. It is not the best but it really is in a better condition than Mon Repos. And as it relates to the cost for rehabilitation–and you know these were the considerations– I think it would have been an easier pill to swallow for us at the Ministry.”
To say that the parents of the previously mentioned east coast primary schools disagreed with the Ministry’s conclusion, would be one of the understatements of the century.
Members of the school’s PTA were present at the meeting, and were the most vocal in their opposition to the timing of the merger. Those who spoke did say that they understood a need for the merger, based on the evidence provided by the Ministry, but that a merger during the 2018/2019 academic year would be too soon to be done safely.
Other parents, brought up the cultural and historical differences between the two schools; stating that the stigma in the community is that the students of the Patience Combined School are not as smart as the ones of the Mon Repos Combined School; a problem which, though it seems trivial to those outside of the community, could be a major cause of concern if any merger were to take place.
This sentiment was a confirmation of the one expressed to this reporter, by a parent of a student of the Mon Repos Combined School, who is also in opposition to its potential closure and its merger with Patience.
He also stated that the historical value of the Mon Repos Combined School should have been taken into consideration before this merger was proposed: “My daughter attends there, my aunt went there, my father went to that school. The school has produced ambassadors, lawyers, pilots…you name them, doctors, nurses, regular farmers, public servants and so on,” noted the parent.
This is not the Mon Repos Combined School
The biggest problem with the merger has not been mentioned. As settlements; we have communities, villages, towns and cities. There are factors that must be present to label these settlements. The presence of a school, church, shops, other service related institutions. Mon Repos as the main community has all. If the school is removed the community dies. It is the central hub of the community along with the Health Centre, community Centre, Day care centre, Pre- school, Post Office. It will be almost criminal to relocate this school to Patience.
I am yet to understand why a photograph of the back of the parish hall being passed off as the Mon Repos Combined School.
*is being passed off
I don’t care who went there or who refused to, but the looks of the one in the first picture shows
something looking more like a cattle stall or worse. What an inspiration for learning. Surely we
can do a lot better today with our available resources, and give our kids something better to desire.
Who the hell built this outhouse and call it school, no wonder the St.Jude Hospital is having problems
passing the smell test.Stop looking backward, Junior’s future is worth more than a Phd.we can do better.
Thank you for reading the article and taking the time to comment.
The main reason the Ministry provided was that the Mon Repos School is in a worse condition than the one at Patience; and for economic and safety reasons, the school with “minimal adjustments” to be made was chosen to host the merger. They really didn’t factor in the other aspects of the potential merger.
They also mentioned that whatever monies they are going to use to repair those schools, will be funded by the World Bank, funds that are in limited supply. And so the most pragmatic choice was made. This will be written about in greater detail in another article.
The “church” and historical aspects of the school and community at large will be addressed in a future article. The situation with the “church” is not yet resolved as far as I’ve been told.
Also, from a Patience perspective, the residents there aren’t pleased about the merger either and their school also has infrastructural problems. The move (if it happens) will affect both communities.
@Mon repos combined and @Perplexed
Thank you both so much for pointing out the problem with the picture. The error has been noted and will be corrected soon.