Letters & Opinion

Who Will Pay the Price of Our Borrowing?

By Thomas Roserie

Saint Lucia stands at an important fiscal crossroads.

In recent months, Parliament has approved or considered a significant borrowing program to finance national development initiatives, including investments in water infrastructure, transportation, renewable energy, climate resilience, digital transformation, education, and port development. These projects have the potential to improve the country’s productive capacity and quality of life.

Few would dispute the need for such investments.

Developing nations do not build modern infrastructure without access to capital. Throughout the world, governments borrow to finance projects whose benefits extend well beyond the present generation. When undertaken responsibly, public borrowing is an essential instrument of national development.

The issue before us, therefore, is not whether Saint Lucia should borrow.

The issue is whether every dollar borrowed today will generate sufficient value to strengthen the nation’s economy tomorrow.

That distinction is fundamental.

Borrowing should never be viewed simply as an increase in public expenditure. It should be regarded as an investment decision, subject to the same standards of discipline, accountability and measurable return that would govern any major private-sector enterprise.

When a business seeks financing, lenders demand comprehensive business plans, projected cash flows, clearly defined objectives, and demonstrable capacity to repay the debt. Governments should be expected to meet an equally rigorous standard because the resources being committed ultimately belong to the country’s citizens.

Public debt is not government debt.

It is the national debt.

Every loan approved by Parliament represents a future obligation that will be serviced through the productivity and tax contributions of the people of Saint Lucia. The responsibility, therefore, extends beyond the administration of the day. It becomes an obligation shared by future governments, future taxpayers, and future generations.

This reality requires a higher level of public accountability.

The International Monetary Fund has noted that while Saint Lucia’s public debt remains manageable, it remains elevated and warrants prudent fiscal management. This should not discourage investment in national development. Rather, it should encourage greater discipline in ensuring that borrowed resources produce measurable economic returns.

Every major borrowing program should therefore be accompanied by clearly defined, transparent, and publicly accessible performance indicators.

Citizens should be able to determine:

  • How much financing has been approved?
  • How much has actually been borrowed?
  • How much has been disbursed?
  • Whether projects remain within budget.
  • Whether implementation is proceeding according to schedule.
  • What measurable economic and social outcomes have been achieved?
  • Whether the anticipated returns justify the financial commitment.

These are not political questions.

They are governance questions.

The success of public investment cannot be measured solely by the number of contracts awarded, ground-breaking ceremonies conducted or projects announced.

Success must ultimately be measured by stronger economic growth, improved national productivity, enhanced public services, increased employment opportunities, greater resilience to external shocks and a stronger fiscal position for the country as a whole.

Saint Lucia’s future prosperity will depend not only on our willingness to invest but also on our ability to invest wisely.

Infrastructure that improves efficiency, expands commerce, strengthens water security, lowers energy costs, and enhances national competitiveness represents productive borrowing. Such investments create assets that continue generating economic value long after the loans have been repaid.

Conversely, projects that fail to achieve their intended outcomes impose costs that extend far beyond the original borrowing. They reduce fiscal flexibility, increase debt-servicing obligations, and limit the nation’s capacity to respond to future challenges.

This is why transparency is no longer optional.

It is an essential component of responsible public finance.

Perhaps the time has come for Parliament to institutionalize an annual Public Borrowing Performance Report covering every major loan approved by the House. Such a report would provide citizens with regular updates on project implementation, expenditure, timelines, expected completion dates, and measurable outcomes.

This would not merely enhance transparency.

It would strengthen public confidence.

Governments should welcome such accountability because successful projects deserve to be measured and recognized. Likewise, projects experiencing delays or underperformance should be identified early enough to permit corrective action before additional public resources are committed.

The objective is not criticism.

The objective is stewardship.

Borrowing, when managed prudently, has the capacity to transform nations.

When managed poorly, it burdens generations that had no voice in the decisions that created the debt.

That is why every loan approved today should be evaluated not only by the urgency of the need it addresses, but by the enduring value it creates for the people of Saint Lucia.

Parliament has fulfilled its constitutional responsibility by debating and approving the necessary financing.

The responsibility now falls to every citizen to ensure that the investments financed by those borrowings deliver the promised outcomes.

For governments come and go, but the nation endures.

Every generation is merely a trustee of Saint Lucia, holding her in trust for those yet unborn.

May we prove worthy of that trust.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Send this to a friend